Joined
·
15 Posts
Just wondering if anybody has been able to handle/shoot both the FNP 45 and the new HK 45? Thoughts on them, good or bad (I know this is a FNP site but any feedback is helpful)? I was at my local gun store and they had both, so I handled them. Even with the flat back strap, the FNP felt bigger and not as comfortable in my hand compared to the HK. The FNP had 14 rounds vs. 10 for the HK, which had a big reason to do with it. I had some trouble with the slide stop on the FNP, maybe because I am use to my 1911, but I had to really work at it or use two hands, will it get better with some break in? Anybody else have any issues with theirs? There is a big gun show here in VA this weekend, which I thought I had made up my mind on the FNP 45, but now I'm not sure. I know that the FNP is a better deal, but now I having second thoughts. Until a few months ago, I was all set on getting a new 1911, which is what I shoot most of the time, then I read about the FNP line and I have never owned a polymer gun, but was willing to try it. I don't like the way Glocks feel, and the Sig P250 isn't out in 45 yet. This next gun will be a range & home protection gun. I don't want to start a flaming war against any manufacturers, but any thoughts/suggestions would be great. BTW - I can any get one of them, so I have to really think this out.
Thanks,
1911Shooter
Thanks,
1911Shooter