[Calhoun]

Does anyone happen to own both these guns and maybe have pictures they could post of the mag wells side by side. I would like to compare the grip thickness. I think the FNP may be a little smaller. I used to have a P95 and found it to be a great gun, but a slightly smaller grip would be nice if available via FN. Thanks

 

[Kost]

Download the .pdf file to your pc and read it, I found it needs to be at the 100% size to be readable, any bigger than that and is goes away. :roll:

Its a four pistol shoot out - it came in a ever so slim 2nd in accuracy to the USP Compact .40 - the Ruger didnt fare well.

http://www.fnhusa.com/press/reviews/index.asp

 

[ShipWreck]

Great link!

 

[Calhoun]

Thanks, but I've seen that article. The ruger tested was the P94. The P95 is a much different animal. Its 9mm, polymer, has a light rail, shorter trigger reach, obviously lighter, and I think it has a smaller grip diameter.

 

[O'Neill]

Never a big Ruger semi-auto fan. I think the FNP would be WAY better!

 

[galland1]

All that I can tell you is that after trying them all on, including the Ruger, the FNP "FIT" the others did not.