I've read the threads on the two ways that members have modified a USG Blackhawk Serpa to fit the MKII.
Frankly both were acceptable ways (heat gun) & (Dremel) but I have concerns in both methods. The heat gun method appears to me to be the better of the two, but if I was going to go that route I think I'd spend the $50 for a MKII holster mold to shape it. That should be the least invasive and the more accurate method
The Dremel method I had considered awhile back, but in taking measurements it appeared to me that it might leave some areas way too thin.
I have a THIRD idea I'm considering.
I have two USG Blackhawk Serpa holsters, I'm considering splitting both holsters, the belt side on one slightly to the outside of the centerline of the holster. On the other holster, split it slightly to the inside, towards the belt side of the holster.
Then use a high strength two part epoxy to join them together creating a wider single holster than they were originally.
Thoughts?
Frankly both were acceptable ways (heat gun) & (Dremel) but I have concerns in both methods. The heat gun method appears to me to be the better of the two, but if I was going to go that route I think I'd spend the $50 for a MKII holster mold to shape it. That should be the least invasive and the more accurate method
The Dremel method I had considered awhile back, but in taking measurements it appeared to me that it might leave some areas way too thin.
I have a THIRD idea I'm considering.
I have two USG Blackhawk Serpa holsters, I'm considering splitting both holsters, the belt side on one slightly to the outside of the centerline of the holster. On the other holster, split it slightly to the inside, towards the belt side of the holster.
Then use a high strength two part epoxy to join them together creating a wider single holster than they were originally.
Thoughts?