FN Herstal Firearms banner

1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
639 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
From the NRA via the Washington Times:

MILLER: Prosecution rests in trial for D.C. man charged for one shotgun shell - Washington Times


The District of Columbia has finished presenting its case on why Mark Witaschek is a danger to society for possessing a single shotgun shell and muzzleloader sabots in his home. This outrageous legal battle shows how far unelected, anti-gun liberals will go to attempt to destroy a man’s life.

When Attorney General Irvin Nathan’s prosecutors rested on Tuesday, they established simply that Mr. Witaschek did not have a registered gun in the city, so he violated the firearms laws by having ammunition.


Mr. Witaschek has never denied these charges, but has said that he didn’t know that inoperable ammunition was illegal. He also insists that his constitutional rights have been violated.
“The police and attorney general obviously have infringed upon my Second Amendment right to keep arms, or ammunition, or even the muzzleloaders borne by our Founding Fathers,” the father of three told me. “And they trampled on almost every other amendment to the Bill of Rights not only for me, but my entire family.”
(Click here to read part one in the series about the police raid of Mr. Witaschek’s home.)
The Trial
Right before the trial began, Mr. Nathan’s office dropped the charge from possession of unregistered ammunition to attempted possession.
It’s unclear how Mr. Witaschek could attempt to possess something that was in his home, but the facts aren’t the reason for the shift. The lesser charge carries a penalty of six months in jail, which means Mr. Witaschek was not eligible for the jury trial he wanted.
[HR][/HR]

[HR][/HR]Judge Robert Morin has listened almost impassively as the government put police officers on the stand to explain how they raided the business man’s house twice looking for guns. Mr. Witaschek is a gun owner and hunter, but has always kept his firearms at his sister’s home in Virginia.
In pre-trial hearings, Judge Morin threw out the first search in June 2012 because the cops neglected to get a warrant. However, he allowed the second search in July to be considered, even though the warrant was based on ammunition found in June.

The David Gregory Defense
Mr. Nathan is best known as the lenient prosecutor who let off NBC News’ David Gregory for openly and knowingly possessing an illegal 30-round magazine on live TV.
“Prosecutors determined that going after David Gregory for possession of an illegal ammunition magazine ‘would not promote public safety nor serve the best interests of the people of D.C.,’” Mr. Witaschek said, referring to the letter of explanation Mr. Nathan sent the lawyer for NBC and Mr. Gregory.
“For my possession of a shotgun shell that misfired during a long ago hunt, why would that be any more of a danger to public safety?”
I asked Mr. Nathan’s spokesman Ted Gest why his boss declined to press charges against Mr. Gregory, but won’t relent on this case in which the defendant didn’t even know he was breaking the law.


3 more pages on the actual WT web site.



These anti-gun, anti-2nd amendment, political lawyers sicken me. :th_puke:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,129 Posts
Have there been any rallies or protests in DC as a show of solidarity to support this man and his family?

Not to trash you for posting this Mac, but it is more disheartening for me to read all the posts on forums from gun owners talking about what they would have done if it was them.

...yet more sternly worded letters and internet polls will surely do the trick.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,450 Posts
All it is- an old fashioned witch hunt. They know nothing is wrong, they are pursing him as guilty and teaching for anything they can. This is unacceptable. I only hope it will come out in the appeal, but nowadays judges are doing politics instead of law. If I were him-- I would move out of dc as fast as I could when it is all over. We are only around the corner from a major violation of civil liberties and human rights violations based only upon prejudices and hidden agendas of these politicians. What will 20 years look like? I'm afraid we are more like what our forefathers attempted to protect us from.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
Top