If you got the $$$$ your gonna pay thru the nose - unless you gotta have that name - the recital - FOV
There are comparable scopes out there for WAY less money - that you could invest elsewhere - Japanese glass is as "good" to German in many aspects... your money in the end & how you want to spend it
Yeah I know they are pricey, I would prefer to not pay $4k on a scope - but I stay true to the saying of buy once, cry once. Do you know of any other scopes out there that are variable zoom in the ballpark of 1/1.5-8/9/10, that have the dual focal plane option? If not, then it may be worth the premium to me over the life of the scope if I could ever find one. I'm open to other options not listed below if you would like to suggest specific alternatives
I don't necessarily want to turn this into another optics thread, the goal of this thread is to get info on S&B, but my other considerations have been (in no particular order):
1. USO MR-10 1.8-10, like it because it is FFP, +other customizable options. Depending on info on S&B this is probably what I'll end up with. I like the price point a lot better than some of the others I'm looking at.
2. S&B 1.5-8x26 Short dot, I like it a lot but the 1-8x24 dual would be a much better option IMO
2. NF NXS 2.5-10x32/42 don't like it because SFP, but otherwise like it. People love it
3. Leupold MK8 1.1-8 CQBSS, like FFP, I feel that it is overpriced and my experience is that Leupold feels kind of sluggish, but people seem to love this scope
4. Elcan DR 1.5-6, I like it a lot, but I do not like the BDC
5. Elcan TR 1/3/9, same complaint as DR
6. Vortex Viper PST 2.5-10x32 FFP, probably the best bang for the buck that I have found. But, after purchasing I would wonder if having the 1.8 lowest setting, overall quality, and other custom options would be worth the premium vs the USO. (This $ + USO $ = S&B$ from the start)