FN Herstal Firearms banner
1 - 3 of 3 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
8,711 Posts
I was expecting sig to answer this most ATF rule. It is simple, the ATF in previous letters, allowed the brace to be manufactured stating "changing the way it is used, does not change the purpose of the brace". For Sig to invest millions of dollars to develop, manufacture, and market this brace based on the ATF's letter, Sig has every reason to challenge this ruling. If the ATF included this information in their initial letter, things would be different and rightfully so. The purpose of a business it to generate wealth, the purpose of a governing agency is to govern, so there for the responsibility of the governing authority is to set rules beforehand in effort to prevent harming a business. Sig should fight this as far as they can.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8,711 Posts
I honestly don't see why gun owners aren't more upset over this. This issue goes beyond Sig brace. ATF is basically demonstrating that they can bypass the Senate and House and make their own law regarding guns.

Crossed lines??? Just Wait till they do something more.---- maybe change how u buy or take possession of a suppressor, or more serialization on sbr's-- this is potentially the beginning and will goe way beyond a brace if they are not checked. They are an extension of the gun control function, and they will if unchecked do more.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top