[iCeMaN]

Thats a f'ing sick rifle! :?

 

[ehryk]

oooooooooohhhhh

the SR-25 :MM: :shock:

I bet this is dern expensive

 

[MrNuke7571]

The owner of one of the local gun shops I frequent has two SR25 rifles. A sniper 20 or 22" setup and a tactical 18" setup. He took the tactical 18" to a shoot last year and he was consistently nailing a 6x8" steel plate at 600yards using M118 ammo. It's a sweet rifle but the price of over $4.5K without optics (He's was using a Nightforce scope (I think 3.5-15x) with it, which costs over $1.5K by itself).

If money is NO object, that's the setup to go with. Everyone I know that has one, rants how sickly accurate they are.

If it is an issue (as it is with most of us), You could get a built-up DSA FAL with an RIS that will shoot 1-2 MOA, 10 adjustable gas settings, can use 20 or 30rnd mags, and is a short stroke piston setup for around $16-1700 brand new.

The Socom M14's are great rifles, but a bit on the heavy side and are not the best platform for optics. They are very accurate, reliable out of the box though. Pricey also.

 

[djv38]

oooooooooohhhhh

the SR-25 :MM: :shock:

I bet this is dern expensive

That's not the SR-25, that's the Army's new M110. There are some minor changes, but they are pretty close to being the same rifle.

 

[Cameron]

For a .308 rifle that is accurate enough (1.25MOA) and can sport an LOP adjustable stock etc I like the DSA SA58 short gas rifles, and used the M4 stock adapter from DSA to install a Magpul CTR. I personally didn't see a need for a rail longer than the receiver, but they have the option available for them, and... it is kinda an FN cousin at least.

With scope and stock riser


With EOTech and stock riser


Irons