Unless they redesigned the barrel, that should not make a difference. A change in the barrel length is not the same as a change to the length of the slide. People have put glock 19 barrels in Glock 26's for example. Furthermore, a threaded barrel would extend the slide beyond the barrel in a similar way. Another few tenths of an inch would not make a difference. In other words, my GUESS is that it would work just fine (unless they redesigned the barrel hood and lockup of course).I can't say for sure, but I seem to recall this question coming up before, and the answer was "No." I think spacing was different for the recoil spring (shorter slide on the FNS-c necessitating the double-captive recoil spring versus the longer standard spring on the FNS.)
It might work (though the retention hook on the two barrels appear similar yet different.) That said, I still doubt it would work for the same reason that the LS barrel won't work in the standard FNS; the barrel cants upwards as the slide retracts. Unless you machine out the front of your slide to resemble that of the LS, it's likely still a no-go...for anything after the first shot when it jams due to metal-on-metal contact, anyway.Unless they redesigned the barrel, that should not make a difference. A change in the barrel length is not the same as a change to the length of the slide. People have put glock 19 barrels in Glock 26's for example. Furthermore, a threaded barrel would extend the slide beyond the barrel in a similar way. Another few tenths of an inch would not make a difference. In other words, my GUESS is that it would work just fine (unless they redesigned the barrel hood and lockup of course).
Not sure what options are really needed for a barrel on a concealed-carry model weapon; as far as performance, reliability, and durability, you already have the best barrel in the industry.I'm warming up to my FNS 9c and it is a wonderful pistol; better than my Glock 19 and 26 in my opinion. Hopefully it catches on enough so that barrel options become available.