Here we go again with "What bullet and loading of cartridge shoots best out of the FNAR?" type of thread. But with a difference. I am interested in short to mid-range ballistic and terminal performance for home defense (HD), neighborhood defense and "Katrina rifle" type applications. I will set the requirements/specs as:
1) Must be cheap enough so you'd gladly shoot hundreds of practice rounds over the months/years, to sight in various optics, keep in practice, etc.
2) Have decent stopping power at short range (that is, not be going so fast as to penetrate with only slight target damage)
3) Have reliably predictable bullet drop out to 150 yards (that is, be good-quality, consistent ammo)
4) Exhibit reduced over-penetration of structures, compared with FMJ (being modest and realistic here - it is a high-power rifle round, after all - there will be some over-penetration)
5) Exhibit significant ability to batter down or penetrate cover/concealment and do real mechanical damage to ... whatever needs to be broken: engine blocks, windshields, door locks, etc. (why else have a high-power rifle?)
6) The round should not be seen as an overly exotic, SWAT-grade or malicious round in a court of law, in case one ever gets dragged there after actual use in self-defense (in other words, it is not wildly "over-kill")
7) Must be factory ammunition, commonly available, not a reload/hand-load - for the same reason as #6
When considering what factory ammunition is out there, of course I am aware of the dozens, by now, of plastic-tipped bullets which have nearly perfect long-range in-flight ballistics and yet offer dramatic, even explosive terminal ballistics in a soft target. These are of interest but definitely do not meet Rqt #1 and may not meet Rqt #5. However, maybe there are some cheap ammo offerings with this type of bullet loaded. Or maybe they'll get cheaper over time as the novelty wears off. Any thoughts?
I want your opinion how best to meet this set of requirements. For now, I am looking at:
Remington Express Core-Lokt .308 Win
180 grain, "SP" (which is really round-nose soft point, RNSP)
Model: R308W2
Stock #: 27844
SKU: 0-47700-05610-4
The subject/candidate round is the one on the left, and is compared with an equal-weight FMJ (well, match-style tiny hollow-point, but an actual 180 gr FMJ would be about the same). Note the rather fulsome exposed lead point on the bullet. Rem sells a PSP (pointed soft point) round that is otherwise identical in every way. I might consider that one, too. Anybody have data on penetration and/or expansion of either of these in standard reference targets? I could post a close-up of dozens of these "SP" = RNSP bullet tips, and what you'd see is, yeh, they really are lumpy. This must have occurred during manufacturing, sorting or packaging, because the as-shipped cartridges are individually isolated and protected. So this is definitely not match-grade ammo. But I wonder how much actual ballistic effect these slight dings have on groupings? I think 4-6" groups inside 150 yds is adequate for the application, and I doubt these would be worse than that. This bullet type might be one of the oldest deer hunting rounds in the marketplace. However, I do not see it or similar bullets being offered in ready-to-shoot ammo by anybody else but Remington. Do you? (You can still get this type of bullet for reloading.)
I am open to recommendations of other factory ammo for this application and set of requirements. Also interested in more data and experience with this exact round. I will post groupings once I get out to a range. Also I would be interested if you would modify my list of requirements for the application? As a matter of "social work", maybe you even can refine the application or its defintition. Thanks, Bill
1) Must be cheap enough so you'd gladly shoot hundreds of practice rounds over the months/years, to sight in various optics, keep in practice, etc.
2) Have decent stopping power at short range (that is, not be going so fast as to penetrate with only slight target damage)
3) Have reliably predictable bullet drop out to 150 yards (that is, be good-quality, consistent ammo)
4) Exhibit reduced over-penetration of structures, compared with FMJ (being modest and realistic here - it is a high-power rifle round, after all - there will be some over-penetration)
5) Exhibit significant ability to batter down or penetrate cover/concealment and do real mechanical damage to ... whatever needs to be broken: engine blocks, windshields, door locks, etc. (why else have a high-power rifle?)
6) The round should not be seen as an overly exotic, SWAT-grade or malicious round in a court of law, in case one ever gets dragged there after actual use in self-defense (in other words, it is not wildly "over-kill")
7) Must be factory ammunition, commonly available, not a reload/hand-load - for the same reason as #6
When considering what factory ammunition is out there, of course I am aware of the dozens, by now, of plastic-tipped bullets which have nearly perfect long-range in-flight ballistics and yet offer dramatic, even explosive terminal ballistics in a soft target. These are of interest but definitely do not meet Rqt #1 and may not meet Rqt #5. However, maybe there are some cheap ammo offerings with this type of bullet loaded. Or maybe they'll get cheaper over time as the novelty wears off. Any thoughts?
I want your opinion how best to meet this set of requirements. For now, I am looking at:
Remington Express Core-Lokt .308 Win
180 grain, "SP" (which is really round-nose soft point, RNSP)
Model: R308W2
Stock #: 27844
SKU: 0-47700-05610-4

The subject/candidate round is the one on the left, and is compared with an equal-weight FMJ (well, match-style tiny hollow-point, but an actual 180 gr FMJ would be about the same). Note the rather fulsome exposed lead point on the bullet. Rem sells a PSP (pointed soft point) round that is otherwise identical in every way. I might consider that one, too. Anybody have data on penetration and/or expansion of either of these in standard reference targets? I could post a close-up of dozens of these "SP" = RNSP bullet tips, and what you'd see is, yeh, they really are lumpy. This must have occurred during manufacturing, sorting or packaging, because the as-shipped cartridges are individually isolated and protected. So this is definitely not match-grade ammo. But I wonder how much actual ballistic effect these slight dings have on groupings? I think 4-6" groups inside 150 yds is adequate for the application, and I doubt these would be worse than that. This bullet type might be one of the oldest deer hunting rounds in the marketplace. However, I do not see it or similar bullets being offered in ready-to-shoot ammo by anybody else but Remington. Do you? (You can still get this type of bullet for reloading.)
I am open to recommendations of other factory ammo for this application and set of requirements. Also interested in more data and experience with this exact round. I will post groupings once I get out to a range. Also I would be interested if you would modify my list of requirements for the application? As a matter of "social work", maybe you even can refine the application or its defintition. Thanks, Bill